04694: m5fmonty: The correct description is "Full Monty (The) (Empire) (MPU5)".

ID	Category [?]	Severity [?]	Reproducibility	Date Submitted	Last Update
04694	Documentation	Typo	Always	Feb 19, 2012, 20:20	Feb 22, 2012, 11:19

Tester	AntoPISA	View Status	Public	Platform	MAME (Official Binary)
Assigned To		Resolution	Fixed	OS	Windows Vista/7 (32-bit)
Status [?]	Resolved			Driver	barcrest/mpu5sw.cpp
Version	0.145	Fixed in Version	0.145u2	Build	Normal
		Fixed in Git Commit		Github Pull Request #

Summary	04694: m5fmonty: The correct description is "Full Monty (The) (Empire) (MPU5)".
Description	Looking the Empire flyer lacks the article. The correct description is "Full Monty (The) (Empire) (MPU5)".
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
Github Commit

Flags
Regression Version
Affected Sets / Systems	m5fmonty

Attached Files	m5fmonty.jpg (427,644 bytes) Feb 19, 2012, 20:20 Uploaded by AntoPISA Empire flyer.

No.08221 Haze Senior Tester Feb 20, 2012, 11:59	is there any chance the required renames for these can be confined to a single updatable report? they're trivial issues and don't really need a report dedicated to each one imho, barely even worth caring about.
No.08222 AntoPISA Tester Feb 20, 2012, 20:14	I do a pleasant thing, pointing out the mistakes you've made by adding all these sets ... I do not spend my days making sure the titles of 'fruits' added to MAME, simply find the errors by collecting and cataloging images to add to my collection. Give the access to the SVN so as to correct directly the names of the sets in the source of MAME, if this method is so annoying.
No.08230 Haze Senior Tester Feb 21, 2012, 03:03	All I'm saying is it might be best suited to a single thread / report, where description change can be posted for consideration.. they're not 'real' bugs which need the full elaborate process IMHO.
No.08232 AntoPISA Tester Feb 21, 2012, 07:48	You might be right, but then remove from this site the opportunity to report documentation (severity typo) errors, if they are not real bugs.
No.08234 Haze Senior Tester Feb 21, 2012, 12:53	In small numbers it's ok.. but there are likely a lot of these with wrong / questionable / debatable namng, or which were released under multiple names with different art.. Don't get me wrong, I want to see them fixed, documented properly, and emulated properly, but the sources used when building the lists weren't of the highest quality, so there are going to a be a lot of current issues with the naming :-) I'd just prefer to see a 'wrong names in Fruit Machines / Mechanical' report where the ones which get corrected can be crossed off one by one
No.08243 AntoPISA Tester Feb 22, 2012, 11:19	[quote]Haze says: I'd just prefer to see a 'wrong names in Fruit Machines / Mechanical' report where the ones which get corrected can be crossed off one by one [/quote] Ok, will do.