04608: eyeszac: good dumps - bad dumps

ID	Category [?]	Severity [?]	Reproducibility	Date Submitted	Last Update
04608	Documentation	Minor	Always	Jan 16, 2012, 09:56	Jan 17, 2012, 17:14

Tester	f205v	View Status	Public	Platform
Assigned To		Resolution	Invalid report	OS
Status [?]	Closed			Driver	pacman/jrpacman.cpp
Version	0.144u6	Fixed in Version		Build
		Fixed in Git Commit		Github Pull Request #

Summary	04608: eyeszac: good dumps - bad dumps
Description	All roms in eyeszac are listed as bad dump, which is wrong. Only 2.7f is bad dump, the others are good. Also rom names are wrong, correct ones are: 1.7d 2.7f 3.7h 4.7j 5.5d 6.5f
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
Github Commit

Flags	Verified with Original
Regression Version
Affected Sets / Systems	eyeszac

Attached Files

No.08035 hap Developer Jan 16, 2012, 15:22	Ok, I'll rename the roms. As for dump status. All the roms are a bad dump, a problem with the highest addressbit it seems.
No.08041 f205v Senior Tester Jan 17, 2012, 16:29	well, I checked it and it looks like the dump is good (apart from rom 2) As a matter of fact what Kold666 dumped is a copy of the PCB you can find here: http://www.citylan.it/lista.php?id=627 which Tirino dumped a few years ago. You can see that the 2 dumps match (apart from rom 2), so it looks to me more as an emulation problem than a dumping problem.
No.08042 hap Developer Jan 17, 2012, 17:14	What I meant with "problem with the highest addressbit", was that the upper and lower 2KB of the roms are (nearly) identical. I noticed it simply by looking at the data with a hex editor. This is not the case in the Techstar version. If you're skeptic about that, compress (.zip) eyeszac and eyes, and compare the compressed sizes. Kold666 was notified of this and agreed to redump his pcb.