- --
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
[ Jump to Notes ]
ID | Category [?] | Severity [?] | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04316 | Compiling | Major | Always | Apr 22, 2011, 16:57 | Apr 23, 2011, 21:21 |
Tester | jordi | View Status | Public | Platform | SDLMAME |
Assigned To | Resolution | Fixed | OS | Linux | |
Status [?] | Resolved | Driver | |||
Version | 0.141 | Fixed in Version | 0.142 | Build | PowerPC |
Fixed in Git Commit | Github Pull Request # | ||||
Summary | 04316: MAME/SDL/Linux/PowerPC does not build | ||||
Description |
0.141 does not build for ppclinux, due to a wrongly declared ifdef construct. Compiling src/mame/drivers/aleck64.c... cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors In file included from src/mame/includes/n64.h:5:0, from src/mame/drivers/aleck64.c:173: src/mame/video/n64.h:43:5: error: "LSB_FIRST" is not defined make[2]: *** [obj/sdl/mame/mame/drivers/aleck64.o] Error 1 The attached patch, now available in the Debian package, fixes it. |
||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Github Commit | |||||
Flags | |||||
Regression Version | |||||
Affected Sets / Systems | |||||
Attached Files
|
fix_ppc_build.txt (611 bytes) Apr 22, 2011, 16:57 Uploaded by jordi Fix sdlmame linuxppc build [Show Content] [Hide Content]From: Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org> Description: Fix linux/ppc build The Linux PowerPC build of the SDL target failed to build due to a badly declared ifdef. Forwarded: no Index: mame-0.141/src/mame/video/n64.h =================================================================== --- mame-0.141.orig/src/mame/video/n64.h 2011-04-22 12:56:00.950598302 +0200 +++ mame-0.141/src/mame/video/n64.h 2011-04-22 12:56:16.858598308 +0200 @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ #define FORMAT_IA 3 #define FORMAT_I 4 -#if LSB_FIRST +#ifdef LSB_FIRST #define BYTE_XOR_DWORD_SWAP 7 #define WORD_XOR_DWORD_SWAP 3 #else | ||||
Relationships
There are no relationship linked to this issue. |
Notes
6
No.07391
Fujix Administrator
Apr 22, 2011, 17:27
|
I allowed a file with the .patch extension. BTW, please DO NOT use Mantis for reporting your request. Please remember THIS IS ONLY FOR MAME. You can use a report note if you want to ask me to allow a .patch file. In addition, your report is for 0.141. Please reconfirm that you have the same issue with the latest version of MAME. |
---|---|
No.07392
Tafoid Administrator
Apr 22, 2011, 17:32
|
Also, since this appears to be an SDL specific issue, you would be better served by posting at the SDLMAME forum if the problem persists with 0.142 (current working base is 0.142u1): http://forums.bannister.org/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=8 |
No.07394
R. Belmont Developer
Apr 22, 2011, 23:11
|
As far as I can tell, this has already been fixed in 0.142. I don't quite get Fuji's objection since this bug *is* for MAME :) |
No.07396
jordi Tester
Apr 23, 2011, 00:50
|
Hi! Sorry Fujix, as you know I'm very new to the MAME community and still need to learn my ways. :) I had no idea where to report the patch thing, I still did not know who the administrators are or how to reach them. Sorry for the noise! R. Belmont, thanks for the info. In Debian we still have 0.141 because we had been working on some other issues before updating to the new version. FYI, mame hit debian unstable today and will appear soonish in Ubuntu distributions. |
No.07397
Fujix Administrator
Apr 23, 2011, 02:45
edited on: Apr 23, 2011, 05:44 |
RB, in fact jordi made an another single bug report that Mantis doesn't allow adding a file with .patch extension. I already deleted it. jordi, I understand your situation. Our Guide Line page and FAQ page will help making a better report. http://mametesters.org/rules.html http://mametesters.org/faq.html Enjoy testing. |
No.07398
R. Belmont Developer
Apr 23, 2011, 21:21
|
Jordi: glad to hear MAME is hitting unstable! Many distro and OS guys contact me directly rather than through MAMETesters - the bannister.org forum is a good place (you'll see posts from Belegdol, who makes the RPMs for Fedora/Red Hat/CentOS) or you can PM me to get an email. Now, I have a NetBSD patch to apply :) |