- --
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
[ Jump to Notes ]
ID | Category [?] | Severity [?] | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
03536 | Misc. | Minor | Have not tried | Nov 15, 2009, 14:59 | Jul 17, 2010, 19:37 |
Tester | Firewave | View Status | Public | Platform | |
Assigned To | Atari Ace | Resolution | Fixed | OS | |
Status [?] | Resolved | Driver | |||
Version | 0.135 | Fixed in Version | 0.138u4 | Build | |
Fixed in Git Commit | Github Pull Request # | ||||
Summary | 03536: PowerPC core: Overlapping data buffers | ||||
Description |
cppcheck reports the following:[c:\svn\mess\src\emu\cpu\powerpc\ppc_dasm.c:454]: (error) Overlapping data buffer dest [c:\svn\mess\src\emu\cpu\powerpc\ppc_dasm.c:518]: (error) Overlapping data buffer dest [c:\svn\mess\src\emu\cpu\powerpc\ppc_dasm.c:1107]: (error) Overlapping data buffer oprs [c:\svn\mess\src\emu\cpu\powerpc\ppc_dasm.c:1112]: (error) Overlapping data buffer oprs The code of the first report looks like this: default: sprintf(dest, "%s%d", dest, spr); break; The destination and source are the same variable, so I guess that's the reason for the warning. It's the same in the other three cases. |
||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Github Commit | |||||
Flags | |||||
Regression Version | |||||
Affected Sets / Systems | PowerPC core | ||||
Attached Files
|
|||||
Relationships
There are no relationship linked to this issue. |
Notes
1
No.05164
Firewave Senior Tester
Nov 15, 2009, 15:11
|
FYI: This report just started a small discussion, if cppcheck should actually warn about this case. It looks suspicious to me as it brings the valgrind warning about memset() with the same or overlapping addresses to mind, which is potentially dangerous and memmove() should be used for. |
---|