- --
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
ID | Category [?] | Severity [?] | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02941 | Crash/Freeze | Minor | Always | Feb 22, 2009, 11:18 | May 15, 2014, 21:03 |
Tester | Firewave | View Status | Public | Platform | MAME (Self-compiled) |
Assigned To | Resolution | Fixed | OS | ||
Status [?] | Resolved | Driver | |||
Version | 0.129u4 | Fixed in Version | Build | Debug | |
Fixed in Git Commit | Github Pull Request # | ||||
Summary | 02941: some konamigx.c sets: Unhandled case in tms57002_decode_cat1 | ||||
Description |
A few sets report:Unhandled case in tms57002_decode_cat1 Here are the sets: puzldama (not flagged as GAME_NOT_WORKING, so this is a valid regression) vsnetscr vsnetseb vsnetscu vsnetsca vsnetscj rungun2 slamdnk2 rushhero racinfrc racinfru |
||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Github Commit | |||||
Flags | |||||
Regression Version | 0.129u4 | ||||
Affected Sets / Systems | some konamigx.c sets | ||||
Attached Files
|
|||||
Relationships
There are no relationship linked to this issue. |
Notes
4
No.03783
etabeta Developer
Feb 22, 2009, 14:45
|
it's not an actual regression, but a byproduct of a progress! in 0.129u4 whatsnew.txt you can read TMS57002 preliminary implementation. [Olivier Galibert] the messages you receive are due to unhandled values in the decode routines of the new CPU. previously the whole CPU emulation was skipped. not sure if this can be filed as a real bug report |
---|---|
No.03786
Haze Senior Tester
Feb 22, 2009, 19:00
|
well, it's a fatal error which causes a previously working set to terminate early, so, it's a bug. |
No.03787
etabeta Developer
Feb 22, 2009, 21:48
|
sorry, I misread the source. I was convinced it was a logged error, not an exception (and I had no handy exe to test) hence it is a bug (waiting for a progress in the CPU core to be fixed) |
No.03895
galibert Developer
Mar 6, 2009, 14:27
|
It's a popmessage() now, the missing instructions are emulated in my tree, but then the ram test fails at not failing. Annoying. |