00103: zombraid: When the flip screen dip switch it set, there are many glitches.

ID	Category [?]	Severity [?]	Reproducibility	Date Submitted	Last Update
00103	Flip Screen/Cocktail	Minor	Always	Jan 21, 2008, 22:00	Jun 10, 2012, 03:26

Tester	Karasu	View Status	Public	Platform
Assigned To		Resolution	Suspended	OS
Status [?]	Closed			Driver	seta/seta.cpp
Version	0.64	Fixed in Version		Build
		Fixed in Git Commit		Github Pull Request #

Summary	00103: zombraid: When the flip screen dip switch it set, there are many glitches.
Description	When the flip screen dip switch it set, there are many glitches and you can't really tell what's going on.
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
Github Commit

Flags
Regression Version	0.64 (addition)
Affected Sets / Systems	zombraid

Attached Files

No.02023 RansAckeR Tester Aug 10, 2008, 09:56	The game was added in 0.64, I find it misleading when the regression version is filled with the version of inclusion, after all it's not a regression. Better would be to use a value making clear it has always been this way. e.g. 'since added' Also I don't know why the regression flag is set in this report?
No.02031 etabeta Developer Aug 10, 2008, 17:17	probably a mistake in the conversion from the old database
No.02032 Tafoid Administrator Aug 10, 2008, 17:45	I know I've always put the version in if it's the inclusion date - it's still the last reported date of the bug and I mention it on my reports that it was included in .xxx.. It narrows down the problem, still, because they know which source to start looking at. Some of those first included versions are not easy to find due to set renames and moving romsets around. In short, if it's noted in the description or information that the regression is the first known version which it was included in MAME - that version listed in regression field will be fine. Perhaps regression should be renamed, so people don't get too technical over the terms...